svv1999 at hotmail.com
Sat May 10 03:32:37 PDT 2008
Yigal Chripun wrote:
> The torrent by itself should not be illegal.
A torrent is a machine made and machine readable citation of _some_
source. Without the content of the _original_ source a torrent would be
meaningless. Therefore a torrent is purely mechanical "derived work"
and _should_ require the same treatment as the original source.
> Had I downloaded the book via the above torrent and than sent a
> paycheck to the authors, would I still be violating the copyright?
You _should_ be violating the copyright, because the content of the
book is not licensed on a "try before you buy" basis "without the prior
> (which they could do simply because they prefer this method of
In some countries this might be called "gross negligence".
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn