Is there a reason for default-int?

Simen kjaeraas simen.kjaras at
Tue Dec 29 08:12:39 PST 2009

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:37:42 +0100, Don <nospam at> wrote:

> Simen kjaeraas wrote:
>> Apart from C legacy, is there a reason to assume anything we don't know  
>> what
>> is, is an int? Shouldn't the compiler instead say 'unknown type' or  
>> something
>> else that makes sense?
> There's now an Error type in the compiler. It's gradually filtering its  
> way through the compiler.



More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list