druntime
Hoenir
mrmocool at gmx.de
Fri Jan 16 08:41:40 PST 2009
Steven Schveighoffer schrieb:
>> Yeah, officially. But there also is a D1 branch of druntime and there are
>> even build instructions for 1.x.
>>
>> So why don't they port tango to that D1 version of druntime?
>
> What is the need? The very purpose of having druntime in the first place is
> to have Tango and Phobos share a common runtime. If Tango is ported to
> druntime, then Phobos is *still* not compatible because Phobos 1 does not
> use it.
>
That's why one needs to rebuild phobos as the guideline states:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/druntime/wiki/GettingStarted
> Tango's runtime is pretty much exactly like druntime anyways, since druntime
> is a port of Tango's runtime.
>
> The only need I forsee is if the druntime 1.0 branch gets some enhancements
> that Tango needs to use.
>
> Once Tango for D2 is finished (being worked on, albeit very slowly), then
> druntime comes into play.
>
Any clues when this will be finished?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list