Array slice length confusion
Tim Matthews
tim.matthews7 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 8 21:44:39 PDT 2009
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> This is really not a good idea. You've removed one of the core features
> of the array -- memory safety. Doing this is just asking for memory
> corruption. You should either re-slice the original array, or create a
> type that has a reference to the original array so it can be resliced
I explicitly said that it was unsafe code and off course most situations
would be better suited with the extra abstraction or re slice the original.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list