Should I compare pointers with is of == ?
jeremiep at gmail.com
Wed Oct 14 07:26:34 PDT 2009
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:15:01 -0400, #ponce <aliloko at gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's a bit unclear to me.
>> I know I must compare references with is but pointers ?
> Like Moritz said, there is no semantic difference with pointers, but you
> may consider comparing with is if you are looking for equivalence. It
> cannot ever be overridden, so if for some reason you decided to change
> your pointer to a class reference, it doesn't accidentally morph into a
> virtual call (possibly to a null object causing a segfault).
I agree, I only learned recently that == is not a direct pointer
comparison for classes, I had to scramble all around my code to replace
them with is and !is, so for good habit I'd go with using is for pointer
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn