template mixins vs. string mixins
un at known.com
Sat Nov 6 02:25:51 PDT 2010
In the past template mixins were a neat special usecase of templates. Now
with the "mixin template()" syntax they've become a separate thing because
you can add special code for handling them, e.g. allowing them to add
constructors to classes.
The question is: what is their right to exist? Is there anything you can
do with them you can't with string mixins (or vice versa)?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn