Associative arrays give compile error
schveiguy at yahoo.com
Wed Oct 6 04:33:02 PDT 2010
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:02:30 -0400, bearophile <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com>
> Denis Koroskin:
>> Compute mutable copy and then cast to immutable. Am I missing something?
> That's possible. But it's an exceptionally dirty thing, I am not sure it
> works in SafeD. A well designed const system has to offer a more clean
> solution :-) Do you agree?
Casting to immutable is the only way to create such a beast. The best way
to ensure as few bugs as possible is to create the object you wish to be
immutable in a function, and cast at the end before returning. This at
least encapsulates the dirtiness in one function (which would probably be
You can also use assumeUnique (which I'm guessing is there so it can be
called in safeD?).
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn