Abstract functions in child classes
regan at netmail.co.nz
Fri Dec 2 09:41:21 PST 2011
On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:24:11 -0000, Adam <Adam at anizi.com> wrote:
> Ok, fine, let me put it THIS way.
> Suppose I use a parent library, and *I* don't update it.
> The USER of my library provides an updated version for some
> unrelated reason.
So.. the user has:
and everything is working ok. Then they update Parent.dll to a new
version. And because D does not require 'abstract' on classes, it all
But.. Your.dll has not been recompiled.. so how is D supposed to detect
Or, were you suggesting the user supply a new Parent.dll to you, and you
rebuild Your.dll with it? In which case, when you run your unit tests you
will get an error, right?
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn