Alex Rønne Petersen
xtzgzorex at gmail.com
Wed Dec 28 12:32:03 PST 2011
On 28-12-2011 18:50, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 12/28/2011 06:42 PM, bearophile wrote:
>> Timon Gehr:
>>> I fully agree, but why does this go to D.learn?
>> Because I think there's no hope to see this situation changed :-)
> Why? The only D code that would get broken would be code that uses a
> global variable in the loop condition of the same name as a do loop
> local variable.
That's still a bit of a risk to take for such a small change, IMHO.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn