Opt-out polymorphism?

[Stewart Gordon]

On 13/02/2011 21:34, Sean Eskapp wrote:
> Is there a way to specify that a function is nonvirtual, but can still be
> "overriden" in base classes? e.g.

Then you're not overriding at all.  You're just declaring a function in the derived class 
that happens to have the same name.

As such, it seems to me to have little use besides writing confusing code.

Stewart.