This seems like what could be a common cause of bugs

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:46:07 -0400, Nick Sabalausky <a at a.a> wrote:

> "Steven Schveighoffer" <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote in message

>>
>> Hm... I didn't know about that switch, I thought warnings were enabled
>> with -w and that made them errors.
>>
>> I suppose you could stick this in there.
>>
>
> -wi: Enable warnings
> -w: Enable warnings and treat them as errors
>
> Didn't used to have -wi, but I bugged the hell out of Walter about it. ;)
>
> The --help screen describes -w and -wi differently than above, but the  
> above
> is more accurate.

Yes, but this is getting into territory where the false positive rate  
might get high.  I don't think it should be an error under -w.  So that  
means -wi and -w would cover different sets of warnings.

-Steve