Overriding "in" operator

[Ali Çehreli]

On 03/04/2011 10:41 AM, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote:
> On 2011-03-04 18:08:08 +0100, spir said:
>
>> Didn't even know 'in' can be defined with opBinary...
>> I use opIn_r ('r' for right side, since the container stand on the
>> right of the expression) everywhere, and it works fine.
>
> Huh. Cool. Works like a charm. Seems cleaner like the opBinaryRight
> solution, really. I just didn't know of it :)
>

It can be seen on the D1 documentation:

   http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/operatoroverloading.html

That is (or "will be") deprecated in D2.

Ali