extends and implements

%u null at dddd.com
Mon Nov 7 11:07:56 PST 2011


== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schveiguy at yahoo.com)'s article
> On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:22:07 -0500, %u <null at devnull.com> wrote:
> In order for such a humongously code-breaking change to occur,
there would
> have to be dire reasons why this was necessary.  Because you
liked Java is
> not a qualifying reason.
> -Steve

Hey man,  Sorry if I annoyed you.  No need to feel insulted.  I get
it: the *real* reason is that it will break alot of code.  I'm just
asking, it's not a big deal.  I find that it helps readability.
But as others have stated, you list the the extended class first
and that's good enough!

thanks.



More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list