Allow empty field function arguments for default?

[Jakob Ovrum]

On Friday, 20 April 2012 at 09:17:18 UTC, 
travert at phare.normalesup.org (Christophe) wrote:
> "Jakob Ovrum" , dans le message (digitalmars.D.learn:34948), a 
> écrit :
>> On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 18:34:41 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Named arguments would probably be better for this.
>>>
>>> fun(c = 5);
>> 
>> Maybe so, but `fun(c = 5);` is not an additive change, while 
>> the OP's suggestion actually is.
>
> How about
>
> int c;
> fun(c = 5);
>
> ?

That is what I was talking about. (did you mean to quote the post 
I quoted, perhaps?)