static struct definition

[monarch_dodra]

On Tuesday, 28 August 2012 at 11:06:51 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:10:47 +0200, monarch_dodra 
> <monarchdodra at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From TDPL: 7.18:
>>
>> "Unlike classes nested within classes, nested structs and 
>> nested classes within
>> structs don’t contain any hidden member outer—there is no 
>> special code generated.
>> The main design goal of nesting such types is to enforce the 
>> desired access control."
>>
>> I suppose this has become obsolete then?
>>    ...Or is it the other way around?
>
> TDPL trumps most everything else, I believe.

Well, at the same time, the reason I asked is because Andrei told 
me to declare a sub-struct as static in one of my pull requests. 
Given he's the author of TDPL...

Anyways, I'll try to bring him into the conversation from.