Default Implementation For an Interface

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Thursday, February 16, 2012 20:17:22 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> Note that I'm saying "overload" not "override".

Ah, so you did. Yes, that would probably be a problem, though aliases can 
probably fix it (that's how you deal with having all of the overloads for a 
function in the same overload set for a derived class when you only override 
some of them). But I haven't tried it, so I don't know.

- Jonathan M Davis