Let this() figure out T implicitly?

[kraybourne]

On 2/17/12 2:38 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 02/17/2012 02:07 PM, Kevin Cox wrote:
>> Yes. At least as the compiler would say. It's a little odd but I
>> believe that is how the D Nam mangling works. I personally just think
>> of Foo!(Class) as the type.
>>
>
> class Foo(T){ ... }
>
> Is syntactic sugar for
>
> template Foo(T){
> class Foo{ ... }
> }
>
> Therefore the type is Foo!(Class).Foo.

Aaah, I see, clever, thx

> I'd prefer the compiler to output
> Foo!(Class) in error messages and for .stringof though, vote here:
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7064