Reflection

[James Miller]

On 28 February 2012 19:27, Joshua Niehus <jm.niehus at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 06:10:11 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
>>
>> It is a template.
>
>
> I see, thanks.
> And I bet its not possible to figure out if a template is a "function
> template" or a "class template" etc...
>

Not really, there might be, but not an obvious one. Its because
templates can hold multiple types of declarations, not just functions
or classes. The "eponymous template" pattern you see normally is not
mandatory.

--
James Miller