lambda template literals?

[bearophile]

Philippe Sigaud:

> This limitation (not being able to alias a lambda) is quite irksome.
> If you do an enhancement request, could you also add one for:
> 
> alias __traits(whatever, whatever) some Result;
> 
> Right now, the alias grammar doesn't allow this and I find this
> limitation jarring.

It's better to add it yourself:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7308

Bye,
bearophile