Switch and break

[Manfred Nowak]

RenatoL wrote:

> why in D we are not obligated

This depends on how the designer wants the coders to think about the 
semantics of a <label>.

If a <label> _always_ is an _additional_ entry into an otherwise linear 
sequence of commands, then fall-through as standard is the consequence.

If a <label> _always_ breaks the linear sequence of commands, then an 
implicit `break' as standard is the consequence.

Because <label>s outside of `switche's are always additional entries 
only, one has to specify `case's as not to be <label>s or to have a 
good reason for the different handling of `label's.

So it is up to you to show that `case's are not`label's or give a good 
reason, if you want a different handling.

-manfred