Pure Contract bug? (unnecessarily strict)
Jesse Phillips
jessekphillips+D at gmail.com
Mon Jan 30 12:04:02 PST 2012
On Sunday, 29 January 2012 at 06:22:26 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
> Maybe someone's brought this up, but i seem to have the
> compiler complaining to me that my function isn't 'pure' by
> calling a non-pure function, specifically to!string().
I don't see why this couldn't be done, not only does it get not
exist in release, it shouldn't be changing variables in
non-release. As mentioned there is a hole for debug code.
Report it:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/
and we'll see what happens with that.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list