ufcs and integer params

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Sunday, July 15, 2012 23:47:58 Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 07/15/2012 11:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 15, 2012 23:35:12 Timon Gehr wrote:
> >>> The second level - i.e. strict property enforcement - also requires that
> >>> non- property functions be called as functions.
> >> 
> >> Exactly. This part is useless.
> > 
> > And there, we will forever disagree.
> 
> If it is a matter of personal preference, then it shouldn't be in the
> compiler.

It's a matter of enforcing the correct syntax, which the compiler does all the 
time. It's just that you don't think that the compiler should care in this 
particular case, since it hasn't cared in the past.

- Jonathan M Davis