immutable ref foreach on values
Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.olsh at gmail.com
Fri Jun 22 05:28:24 PDT 2012
On 22-Jun-12 16:16, bearophile wrote:
> Tobias Pankrath:
>
>> I think it's good. In this special case, the compiler can see that you
>> can't change array behind his back. That seems not to be true in general.
>
> But aren't int implicitly castable to immutable?
>
then every array is implicitly castable to tail immutable.
int[] array = [1, 2];
foreach (ref immutable(int) x; array) {
...
func(arr); // arr is mutable, thus func can change x
// so x can be at most const
}
--
Dmitry Olshansky
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list