aa.remove in a destructor

[Ellery Newcomer]

On 06/24/2012 02:53 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
>
> I think no, as any with operation involving GC. For instance while you
> are removing elements table may decide to rehash itself and that means
> it may trigger allocation.
>

okay, it looks like my [inherited] code is using aa's to map D objects 
to C wrapper objects and keep references to the D objects around. If the 
builtin aa's aren't going to work, I'll need something else.

Come to think of it, though, shouldn't the standard library provide an 
aa implementation that doesn't rely on the gc?