Stack overflow

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Monday, June 25, 2012 08:24:59 Namespace wrote:
> > Wait, you have a template mixin inside of Foo which passes Foo
> > to it? I don't
> > know if you can get away with that or not, since you're trying
> > to pass a type
> > to a template while you're adding stuff to it via that
> > template. So, the type
> > is incomplete. I'm willing to be that that's your problem, but
> > I don't know.
> > 
> > - Jonathan M Davis
> 
> If so, the problem would have to solved if i switch from a mixin
> to an abstract class. Or not?
> Or have you any other idea?

If you don't need to use any compile-time reflection on the type itself (i.e. 
you just need its name), you can use a string mixin.

- Jonathan M Davis