Shared value types can not be destructed

[Benjamin Thaut]

Am 13.11.2012 17:25, schrieb Benjamin Thaut:
> Apperently this is by design:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8295
>
> To clarify: It is not possible to define a destructor that will be
> called on the destruction of a shared struct.
>
> In a different thread Walter commeted this bug with:
> "If you include an object designed to work only in a single thread
> (non-shared), make it shared, and then destruct it when other threads
> may be pointing to it ...
>
> What should happen?"
>
> I did try to think of a case where his scenario would actually break
> something, but couldn't find one. If someone has more knowdelge about
> this situation some clarification would be great. Maybe even a small
> code sample that illustrates the problem.
>
> Kind Regards
> Benjamin Thaut

anyone?