Operator overloading through UFCS doesn't work

[Artur Skawina]

On 10/14/12 08:13, Maxim Fomin wrote:
> The only mentioned reason is to allow writing operator overloading methods outside type scope - just because somebody (currently two people) consider it logical to broaden UFCS usage.

It's more than two people... Also, it's not about "broadening UFCS usage", it's about making UFCS work properly.

> This doesn't solve ay practical issue.

Obviously, it does. Otherwise this issue wouldn't come up repeatedly.

artur