Win Headers

[frustrated2]

I prefer languages with more "batteries included" - for sure. its 
a nice compiler, love the language, but i do not want to waste 
the time to do everything myself. even basic compilers (yuck) 
offer more tools, windows programming and db stuff than D.


On Thursday, 12 December 2013 at 09:49:31 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Mike Parker:
>
>> I would be content if DMD did not ship Win32 bindings at all, 
>> except for the minimal needed to implement cross-platform 
>> stuff in Phobos. As it stands, the static libs for the Win32 
>> API that ship with DMD are old and don't include a good number 
>> of modern functions anyway. IMO, complete OS API bindings 
>> *should* be separate. I wouldn't expect them with the compiler.
>
> I prefer languages with more "batteries included".
>
> Bye,
> bearophile