pure vs std.range.retro

John Carter john.carter at taitradio.com
Sun Dec 22 16:35:42 PST 2013


Yup.

That's the answer.

Upgraded to 2.064 and good things happened.

Diff shows flocks of diffs in std.range

Thanks.


On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Ali Çehreli <acehreli at yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 12/22/2013 02:37 PM, John Carter wrote:
>
> > This code compiles and runs OK if I remove the keyword "pure" or if I
> > remove the ".retro"
>
> Third option: It compiles and runs OK if you upgrade your compiler. ;)
>
> Works with DMD64 D Compiler v2.065-devel-41ebb59.
>
> Ali
>
>


-- 
John Carter
Phone : (64)(3) 358 6639
Tait Electronics
PO Box 1645 Christchurch
New Zealand

-- 

------------------------------
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended recipient. 
It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be the subject of legal 
or other privilege, none of which is waived or lost by reason of this 
transmission.
If you are not an intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, 
distribute or reproduce such email, any attachments, or any part thereof. 
If you have received a message in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and erase all copies of the message and any attachments.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been altered or 
corrupted during transmission nor can we guarantee that any email or any 
attachments are free from computer viruses or other conditions which may 
damage or interfere with recipient data, hardware or software. The 
recipient relies upon its own procedures and assumes all risk of use and of 
opening any attachments.
------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-learn/attachments/20131223/8d5ed6be/attachment.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list