Why is immutable not possible as a result of a reduce expression?

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Sunday, January 06, 2013 21:59:32 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 1/6/13, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
> > If you or someone else
> 
> It's going to have to be someone else. When someone asks something on
> IRC/NG and another person responds with "it's because it's not a type
> constructor", or "it's not a storage class" I get completely thrown
> off and don't understand what they mean, exactly because there's no
> solid definition in the docs.

Well, I think that we can get a solid definiton for a type qualifier / 
constructor fairly easily, but storage class is harder, because there really 
isn't one.

- Jonathan M Davis