Enhancing foreach

[Jesse Phillips]

On Wednesday, 9 January 2013 at 17:07:50 UTC, ixid wrote:
> It would be even nicer to be able to write for(i;5) and have it 
> behave as foreach.

I hated java's choice to use for as foreach. It does not prepare 
me for the semantics of what I'm about to read. And when I go to 
write it and don't remember, is it for(Type thing; range) or 
for(Type thing, range)? no it is for(Type thing : range)

I was already heavily using foreach in do before Java got one.