dynamic arrays of immutable question: Are the elements actually mutable

[monarch_dodra]

On Wednesday, 9 January 2013 at 18:17:52 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
> The "good news" is that since the values are T.init'd, then 
> opEqual becomes somewhat more valid, although arguably, it 
> should really be in-place construction, *especially* if 
> immutable is involved (or types without opAssign...).

Wait, never mind. That's only a special case in Appender's 
implementation. Since it mallocs the rest of the time, this 
doesn't hold, and anything with a constructor (or just) will not 
be correctly initialized :/