Enhancing foreach

[Raphaël Jakse]

Le 10/01/2013 10:23, monarch_dodra a écrit :
> On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 03:29:21 UTC, Peter Summerland wrote:
>
> The only thing I'd want to be able to do is:
> //----
> foreach ( ; 0 .. 5)
> {
>      writeln("hello");
> }
> //----
>
> If I don't need a named variable, why force me to define a symbol?
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9009
>
> I know I could just use "i" and move on, but when code starts getting
> complex, and you already have i, j, k, ii, dummy etc..., it can make a
> difference.


What about :

foreach (0 .. 5)
{
     writeln("hello");
}

?