does alias this work correctly?

[Zhenya]

On Sunday, 13 January 2013 at 23:21:20 UTC, Andrey wrote:
>> I just want very much avoid renaming function,it's principle 
>> for me.
>> So I would like to know is my sample right or no.
>
> I think that the main overall principle here is that is it 
> impossible to have two functions which differ only by static 
> attribute. I even do not imagine the use case of this.
>
> Well, here is the most natural way to achieve similar effect, I 
> suppose:
>
> struct MyStruct {
>
> 	struct Static {
>
> 		static void myfun() {
> 			writeln("static myfun");
> 		}
> 	}
>
> 	void myfun() {
> 		writeln("myfun");
> 	}
>
> 	static Static opCall() {
> 		return Static();
> 	}
> }
>
>
> MyStruct obj;
>
> obj.myfun(); //dynamic;
> MyStruct().myfun(); //static;
I do not agree with you, static attribute is not a small detail.
this reference is the same argument, like all the others. And 
despite the fact that
function signatures are the same, the actual list of arguments 
are different.