tiny std.datetime question

[Rob T]

On Thursday, 17 January 2013 at 07:17:57 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> I'd still like to break it up a bit, but I'm not going to do it 
> unless some
> variant of DIP15 or DIP16 is implemented so that it can be done 
> without
> breaking any code. So, it probably won't be broken up any time 
> soon. It's not
> a big an issue though when the documentation is broken up.

Yes, a complex module or multi-feature module could just have the 
docs broken up into separate sections, however those DIPs you 
mention look to me like they are definitely worth implementing. 
There's a lot of value being able to structure and organize your 
code better.

--rt