Eponymous template with full template syntax

[monarch_dodra]

On Monday, 1 July 2013 at 22:46:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 07/01/2013 02:10 PM, monarch_dodra wrote:
>
> >> That is confusing.
> >
> > UFCS construction: Yes.
>
> I *think* I did not know it but I can't be sure. :)

AH... I looked at the threads some more: I was actually thinking 
about a proposal that wanted (just like UFCS), to allow 
non-intrusively adding constructors.

So I guess UFCS and constructors are fair game? I do not like 
this at all...