inverse of std.demangle?

[Sean Kelly]

On Jul 10, 2013, at 10:44 AM, Timothee Cour <thelastmammoth at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks much, that's a good start.
> Template support would definitely be needed as it's so common.
> This should go in std.demangle (or maybe a new std.mangle)

core.mangle/demangle.  It would have to be done in a way that avoided allocating though (similar to core.demangle), to be in core.