Help me investigate a bug to file it.
monarch_dodra
monarchdodra at gmail.com
Wed Jul 10 12:36:06 PDT 2013
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 00:06:11 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
> That plus a non-existing this._input, results in a bit (too
> much)
> magic, and the first test passes. The other one fails because of
> the '$' (ie opDollar() call).
>
> artur
In any case, it is now filed:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10597
I reduced it to this (imo) neat usecase:
//----
struct R
{
void opIndex(int);
int opDollar();
}
R r;
void foo()
{
static assert(is(typeof(r[0]))); //ok
static assert(is(typeof(r[$]))); //ok
}
static assert(is(typeof(r[0]))); //ok
static assert(is(typeof(r[$]))); //fails (!)
//----
Thanks again for the help :)
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list