immutable struct/class is mutable!
JS
js.mdnq at gmail.com
Mon Jul 15 10:35:52 PDT 2013
On Monday, 15 July 2013 at 16:17:02 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> On Monday, 15 July 2013 at 15:59:44 UTC, JS wrote:
>> On Monday, 15 July 2013 at 15:08:58 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>> On Monday, 15 July 2013 at 14:50:04 UTC, JS wrote:
>>>> Why does isMutable and isAssignable return true for a
>>>> struct/class that are immutable?
>>>>
>>>> immutable struct A { }
>>>>
>>>> isMutable!A returns true.
>>>
>>> looks like
>>>
>>> immutable struct A
>>> {
>>> int a;
>>> }
>>>
>>> acts as a
>>>
>>> struct A
>>> {
>>> immutable:
>>> int a;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Now, I don't see this use case (qualified aggregate
>>> definition) anywhere in spec and this may be intended
>>> behavior. But I do agree this looks misleading.
>>
>> Yes, I need immutable to do what it does but also need a way
>> to emulate an enum.
>>
>> This is because I need to constrain my templates properly. If
>> struct A isn't immutable then it is no different than any
>> other struct which is bad because I want only enum like
>> structs.
>>
>> maybe immutable immutable(struct) A would be a good way to
>> specify this.
>>
>> An immutable struct should be similar to an enum... a purely
>> compile time construct not meant to be instantiated in any way.
>
> Why is it you're trying to emulate an enum? Perhaps there's a
> way to achieve what you want by more normal means.
see my other recent post...
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list