Sorting according to a primary and secondary criterion
    bearophile 
    bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
       
    Wed Jul 17 05:59:12 PDT 2013
    
    
  
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
> Actually, I don't find it needs any more memory than regular 
> schwartzSort (which I was using anyway),
A and array of tuples should take more memory. Try with a much 
larger input array.
> but it does cost _speed_ -- quite a lot. :-(
Right, schwartzSort is quite slow:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5077
But thankfully there are simple means to speed up schwartzSort... 
(like using alloca for small input arrays, improving its code, 
using minimallyInitializedArray, etc).
Bye,
bearophile
    
    
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list