Passing a class instance to a thread via spawn()
Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net
Fri Jul 19 08:33:22 PDT 2013
On Thursday, 18 July 2013 at 23:54:22 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 04:23 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have a data structure which is a final class. Once
> created, the contents of
> > the class will not be mutated (only its const methods will be
> called).
> >
> > Is there any way to pass this to a thread via spawn() or via
> message-passing?
> > I've seen instructions to use shared() but if I try and
> declare the class this
> > way I get errors such as "non-shared method is not callable
> using a shared
> > object" and "non-shared const method is not callable using a
> shared object".
> >
> > The ideal would be to mark this object, once created, as
> immutable -- but trusty
> > methods like assumeUnique() don't work for classes!
> >
> > Can anyone advise?
> >
> > Thanks & best wishes,
> >
> > -- Joe
> >
>
> The following seems to work but it may have more 'immutable'
> keywords than you need. For example, the final class F need not
> be 'immutable'. I think it is the objects of it that you want
> 'immutable'. (?)
>
> Anyway, the following may be a start:
>
> import std.concurrency;
> import core.thread;
>
> interface I
> {
> int foo();
> }
>
> class C : I
> {
> int i;
>
> this(int i) immutable {
> this.i = i;
> }
>
> override int foo() {
> return 1;
> }
> }
>
> immutable final class F : C
> {
> double d;
>
> this(int i, double d) immutable {
> super(i);
> this.d = d;
> }
>
> /* 'override' keyword is required if the class is
> non-immutable
> * and not required otherwise. Bug? */
> int foo() {
> return 2;
> }
>
> int bar() const {
> return 3;
> }
> }
>
> void worker(immutable(F) f)
> {
> f.bar();
> }
>
> void main()
> {
> auto f = new immutable(F)(42, 1.5);
>
> spawn(&worker, f);
>
> thread_joinAll();
> }
>
> Ali
That's a very interesting idea. Thanks so much for sharing! :-)
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list