Ping qznc: Re: A little of coordination for Rosettacode

[bearophile]

Brian Rogoff:

> The current D code for Dining philosophers does not compile 
> with dmd v2.063.2, the error message being
>
> dining.d(34): Error: cannot uniquely infer foreach argument 
> types

I try to keep the D entries on Rosettacode updated, but every dmd 
release breaks tons of code, and Rosettacode has almost one 
thousand D programs (many tasks have two or more D entries, to 
show different solutions or different coding style, or to show 
code with different tradeoffs, etc), so you find some broken 
programs.

I don't know what's changed in taskPool.parallel, I will 
investigate later. Or you can investigate yourself if you want.


> BTW, I like the coding style being used in the rosetta examples 
> and TDPL much better than the library style.

I try to keep the D code on Rosettacode with a quite uniform 
style. It follows the dstyle, the main difference is the opening 
brace that's in Egyptian style, but such brace style is required 
only in Phobos, while the dstyle does not require the Phobos 
style for all D code, it's in "Additional Requirements for 
Phobos":
http://dlang.org/dstyle.html

Later,
bearophile