Trouble with destroy

[H. S. Teoh]

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 05:18:38AM +0200, Meta wrote:
> On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 19:11:53 UTC, Namespace wrote:
> >As always. As soon as you wrote it, you've got the solution.
> >----
> >destroy!A(a);
> >----
> 
> This still seems like it should be worth reporting. I can't
> remember... Is partial ordering done between multiple matching
> template functions like it is with regular functions? If so, there
> should be no ambiguity in choosing the second one.

IIRC, D templates don't have best-match like C++ does; it was an
explicit design choice that multiple matching templates is an error.


T

-- 
Lawyer: (n.) An innocence-vending machine, the effectiveness of which depends on how much money is inserted.