'with(Foo):' not allowed, why?
via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Sat Aug 9 02:11:51 PDT 2014
On Saturday, 9 August 2014 at 03:46:05 UTC, timotheecour wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 August 2014 at 17:03:23 UTC, Timothee Cour via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
>> Is there a reason why 'with(Foo):' is not allowed, and we have
>> to
>> use with(Foo){...} ?
>> It would be more in line with how other scope definitions work
>> (extern(C)
>> etc)
>
> ping, anyone?
Probably for syntactic reasons: `with` is a statement, while
`extern(C)`, `@safe`, `private` etc. are attributes.
But the idea is certainly nice, it would only require a simple
rewriting rule.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list