DIP64 - Regarding 'pure' and 'nothrow'
Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Wed Aug 27 13:17:10 PDT 2014
It would be nice if we could at least allow both "nothrow" and
"@nothrow". Because "nothrow" is already a keyword there's no
possibility of a UDA overriding it. This would at least give
people the option of making their code look nicer.
The "delete" keyword is deprecated[1] and making that decision
never broke any code.
[1] http://dlang.org/deprecate.html#delete
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list