The package feature is ignored when the file name is package.di

[Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Saturday, December 13, 2014 02:34:21 Jeremy DeHaan via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Is this on purpose? Granted, I almost never use interface files,
> but I had a whim to use them for what I was working on today.
>
> Everything worked fine when I renamed the file to package.d, but
> apparently package.di is not acceptible.

It probably was never considered. But given that all that's really supposed
to be put in a package.d file is public imports, it's not like supporting
package.di really adds much, though arguably it should work for
consistency's sake.

- Jonathan M Davis