A little of coordination for Rosettacode

[bearophile]

Brad Roberts:

> I think this is a mistake.  They should compile with a released 
> compiler.

Why? And why do you think that outweighs the several advantages 
of having entries compilable only with the latest beta compiler?
(Currently there are 40-50 entries that don't compile with the 
released dmd 2.064.)


> They also likely form a potentially interesting set of 
> regression tests that someone ought to volunteer to test beta's 
> against.

Rosettacode site has many different purposes; I also use those 
programs to test the dmd compiler for regressions. But to do this 
effectively you have to use the latest compiler changes.

Also, how can you update manually on the site tens of entries all 
at once when a new compiler comes out?

Bye,
bearophile