Interfaces allow member definitions?

Frustrated c1514843 at drdrb.com
Thu Jan 30 14:37:38 PST 2014


On Thursday, 30 January 2014 at 21:42:39 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:23:55 -0500, Frustrated 
> <c1514843 at drdrb.com> wrote:
>
>> Again, you have to get off of what has been defined. You have 
>> the
>> mentality exactly the same as those that thought the earth was
>> flat, imaginary numbers were nonsense/useless, man couldn't go 
>> to
>> the moon.
>
> OK, then. With that, I shall retire from this discussion :)
>
> -Steve

It would be nice if you could understand what I'm getting at but
it's like I keep telling you the earth and you don't believe me ;)

Almost surely we are arguing about different things. Mine is more
syntax substitution and yours is more implementation.

In any case, it doesn't matter because it will never be
implemented the way I think it could be so we are just wasting
our time(or I'm wasting yours, how ever you want to see it ;)


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list