How to call opCall as template?

[Namespace]

> So, if your notation was implemented, it would no longer be easy
> to know. The compiler would have to be context sensitive, which
> is more complex and not perfect. I doubt Walter would go for 
> that
> so you'll never be able to use an explicit templated opCall...
> but implicit are ok.

I never wanted a new notation. I only want that the bug gets 
fixed. :)