mutable reference to const object

Vadim Lopatin coolreader.org at gmail.com
Thu Mar 6 09:57:02 PST 2014


On Thursday, 6 March 2014 at 17:47:34 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> There was a very long discussion on this. I think the short 
> answer is to keep the syntax and semantics composed of a 
> sufficiently low number of parts (in D you don't have syntax to 
> tell apart objects from their references).

Thank you!
Now it's clear.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list